Translate

Monday, June 18, 2018

When truth matters more

Much shifted positively for me with my find May of last year of a new way to calculate the modular inverse. It was important for the world of course. But for me personally it was a different experience could compare with my discovery of the prime count to continuous function explanation, now over fifteen years ago.

To me there are similarities in terms of ease of checking from others, and celebrity around the subject area. Where yeah, celebrity is kind of boring, because is simply human chatter, but hey, is curious too.

Also importantly for others provided something really easy to check, and could give perspective on social aspects to the mathematical community not necessarily so easy to delineate without such a result.

People can claim all kinds of things, but how often in human history do you have a major mathematical find with which to test an influential group of them? Very rarely actually.

I like to say let's you x-ray certain social things, as a metaphor for how much can then peer into both the math community and into minds within that community. Where will admit have puzzled over thoughts revealed for over a decade now.

Mathematics can enable perfect tests, of human beings. And you can trap people into giving their actual feelings beyond any possibility of useful lies.

Is weird though, as now over a year later, yup, think same pattern is trying to play out that happened with my prime counting finds. Is actually a bit more refined as well, as if certain people believe they have learned lessons from there.

Which is a depressing subject which have decided to avoid talking much. Besides is weird: what kind of delusion would lead anyone to think can actually suppress major mathematical results? Has never succeeded in human history, with good reason. And regardless, why would any human try?

For me of course is fascinating to watch. The effort betrays a lack of basic understanding of knowledge, and why we humans appreciate, and how we use. Looks like some believe in celebrity as the basis for ALL interest, which is not even remotely close to reality. One reason I decry the celebrity model for academics. And routinely now dismiss those who clearly crave attention to themselves for their discovery.

World needs the knowledge. The knowledge is what our species will keep using for benefit of humanity.

Celebrity is actually not well understood in our times. I studied it carefully, and understand better how much is illusion.

Especially with modern celebrity which actually is: simply excited human discussion around a person, topic or event, usually. Which is why fades so quickly, always. People will only talk excitedly for so long. Disrupting celebrity is actually surprisingly easy--just shift the conversation. Eventually am confident we will crush celebrity out of intellectual areas including mathematics and the sciences.

Knowledge is best valued on use.

For those who wonder, web enables worldwide attention very rapidly, so useful knowledge sweeps the planet very quickly.

Have watched over and over again through the years and regardless find it, unsettling.

How people discuss though? Can be complicated.

The result also validated for me an approach which focuses more on discovery. Is just more fun to keep figuring things out than worry about, human chatter on the subject of what you discovered! Is more cool too.

Also shows irrelevance of official recognition in the modern age. World apparently is in a slow meltdown of prior systems and couldn't care less. And am a fan of the journal system, but relish a lack of need for journals. But am in a unique position.

As the world's latest major mathematical discoverer, of course I don't need journals.

Wonder when will have to stop saying am latest? For now there doesn't seem to be any competition there though. When there is another, I'll just note am a major discoverer, I guess. Should I even bother though?

Checking me is easy. But who has the will to let the truth matter more? That intrigues me as well.

Is a dynamic arena but have found my results with some web searches.

Like search: modular inverse innovation

Or search: modular inverse discovery

Others may work as well, of course.

Is dynamic as, is about others. I have no control over web search results, of course.

So yeah, this post was really for people who may have wondered: was there something wrong with the reaction? Answer of course is, yeah. But is lots naive really. And I wouldn't worry over it.

Of course I've lost nothing. Recognition at best comes from those who can appreciate the accomplishment. And the web helps you to know. Thank you to those who do.

Good thing though is how easily can check my math, if you wish. And then have no further doubts, if you had any.

Know it helped me. But I'm at the center of the storm is how I feel it is, and is like, out there are the hurricane force winds, and here, is calm.


James Harris

No comments: