tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11119110.post116818568486203002..comments2023-11-18T14:03:22.238-05:00Comments on Some Math: Using prime counting formulaJames Harrishttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09144921711051129429noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11119110.post-87760567258299923232008-07-19T08:54:00.000-04:002008-07-19T08:54:00.000-04:00Incredible . :)Incredible . :)Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06587925380070288159noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11119110.post-68401003026590099552007-01-21T14:23:00.000-05:002007-01-21T14:23:00.000-05:00Hmmm...what I have can be confusing. Maybe I shou...Hmmm...what I have can be confusing. Maybe I should have said "need" versus "get" another prime. I think I'll change it.James Harrishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09144921711051129429noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11119110.post-1168521450077232302007-01-11T08:17:00.000-05:002007-01-11T08:17:00.000-05:00You have the comment "Just for fun, I'll do a quic...You have the comment <I>"Just for fun, I'll do a quick calculation for 120, as that's the last number before you get another prime, so n still equals 4, ..."</I><BR/><BR/>The way I read this is that you're implying that the number that comes after 120 is prime. But that number, 121, is not prime. In fact, it is a perfect square.<BR/><BR/>Did I misunderstand you?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com