I am curious about the latest result and figured a simple test would allow me to see what Diophantine chains look like, so here goes.
The method works with an equation of the form
c1x2 + c2xy + c3y2 = c4 + c5x + c6y
and to keep things easy for me, I'll use
x2 + 2xy + 3y2 = 4 + 5x + 6y
so I have
c1 = 1, c2 = 2, c3 = 3, c4 = 4, c5 = 5, and c6 = 6
so next I need to calculate
A = (c2 - 2c1)2 + 4c1(c2 - c1 - c3) = -8
B = 2(c2 - 2c1)(c6 - c5) + 4c5(c2 - c1 - c3) = -40
and
C = (c6 - c5)2 - 4c4(c2 - c1 - c3) = 33
and I have then the new quadratic Diophantine:
(2A(x+y) - B)2 - 4AS2 = B2 - 4AC
which is
(-16(x+y) + 40)2 + 32S2 = 2656
and dividing off 16, I have
(-4(x+y) + 10)2 + 2S2 = 166.
Which has a solution at S=9, giving
-4(x+y) + 10 = +/- 2
and trying the positive first gives x+y = 2, while the negative gives x+y = 3.
Trying the first case, x = 2-y and plugging that into the equation gives
(2-y)2 + 2(2-y)y + 3y2 = 4 + 5(2-y) + 6y
which is
4 - 4y + y2 + 4y - 2y2 + 3y2 = 4 + 10 - 5y + 6y
which is
2y2 -y - 10 = 0,
so y = (1 +/- sqrt(1 + 80))/4 = (1+/-9)/2 = -2 as the other case is a fraction.
Then x=4, so I can try x=4, y=-2, with
x2 + 2xy + 3y2 = 4 + 5x + 6y
and get
16 + 2(4)(-2) + 3(-2)2 = 4 + 5(4) + 6(-2)
which is 12 = 12, so they balance out as they must. I'll leave the second solution to the reader. Notice there are only two.
That was easy to solve but I'm curious about the next value in the chain, so looking again at
(-4(x+y) + 10)2 + 2S2 = 166
I now have c1 = 1, c3=2, and c4 = 166, while all other values are 0, so
A = -8, B = 0, and C = 1992
so the new quadratic Diophantine after some simplifying is:
(-4(-4(x+y)+10 + S))2 + 2T2 = 3984
where the right hand side is definitely increasing which indicates an infinite chain.
Intriguingly 3984 = 16(3)(83), which is intriguing because -2 must be a quadratic residue modulo each prime or 0 modulo that prime, and notice that 3 - 2 = 1, and 83 - 2 = 81.
The existence condition from the quadratic residues is probably the absolute determinant as to whether or not integer solutions exist, I'd surmise.
James Harris
No comments:
Post a Comment