And importantly also there is a process for correction when people get things wrong.
So glad to reiterate my support of the journal process and note a key post. It is important to maintain functional perspective.
While relish my current lack of need for mathematical journals for my own research is worth emphasizing they remain important.
1 comment:
How would you suggest we take the bias and the undue influence from editors can have out of the editorial process? Personally I like ArxIv I but it still requires the person writing the paper to know somebody who was considered qualified.
Post a Comment