Ended with sqrt(3) approximately equals x

_{n+1}/y

_{n+1}, where:

x

_{n+1}= 7x

_{n}+ 12y

_{n}

y

_{n+1}= 4x

_{n}+ 7y

_{n}

and x

_{0}= 1, and y

_{0}= 0;

And I stopped with x = 1351, and y = 780, which I got using:

**(7x + 12y)**

^{2}- 3(4x + 7y)^{2}= 1And going to use the BQD Iterator to advance that a couple more, and then use that equation, to get a better approximation.

So next is:

(19x + 33y)

^{2}- 3(11x + 19y)

^{2}= -2

And next iteration is:

(52x + 90y)

^{2}- 3(30x + 52y)

^{2}= 4

And can divide off that 4 to finally get:

**(26x + 45y)**

^{2}- 3(15x + 26y)^{2}= 1Which is my new set and a quick check with x = 1, and y = 0, shows it works.

Now lets advance our x and y, so plugging in, x = 1351, and y = 780, I get:

(26(1351) + 45(780))

^{2}- 3(15(1351) + 26(780))

^{2}= 1

Which gives me my new x and y:

**(70226)**

^{2}- 3(40545)^{2}= 1And sqrt(3) approximately equals 70226/40545 which is about: 1.7320508077

Which is really close.

Now the new equations for approximating sqrt(3) are:

sqrt(3) approximately equals

**x**, where:

_{n+1}/y_{n+1}**x**

_{n+1}= 26x_{n}+ 45y_{n}**y**

_{n+1}= 15x_{n}+ 26y_{n}and x

_{0}= 1, and y

_{0}= 0;

And why do it? Just for fun. Will admit it started to interest me that you have these recursive equations. So mainly did this post just to write it out that way.

There is some symmetry with the coefficients. And 3 itself is in there as a factor. Interesting.

You know you can just endlessly play with numbers just for fun. Of course it's trivial to get a calculation for the square root of 3, from the pc, but it's not like I need one.

Just playing around.

James Harris